Lot-document scope confirmed before quotation · Research use only
  • Specification Review
  • Lot Documents on Request
  • Business Support · Xi’an
  • Destination Eligibility Confirmed
西安诺和达生物科技有限公司

Research & insights

LL-37 at the Ocular Surface: Expression and In-Vitro Antimicrobial Data

By NHD Technical TeamPublished
Ocular cell culture and antimicrobial assay in a microbiology laboratory
Article-specific editorial image.

A frequently cited LL-37 paper examined expression in human ocular-surface cells and antimicrobial activity in laboratory assays. It did not administer LL-37 as a treatment to patients.

What the record shows

  • The study detected LL-37/hCAP18 RNA and peptide in corneal and conjunctival epithelial samples.
  • Reported bacterial EC50 values ranged from 1.3 to 3.6 µg/mL across the tested strains.
  • The antiviral experiments were direct inactivation assays, not a clinical infection trial.
Scientist reviewing bacterial assays and peptide-membrane research data
Original editorial illustration of the research context. It is not a study figure, patient image, supplied-product photograph or representation of trial material.

Study record

The paper supports a role for endogenous LL-37 in ocular innate immunity and shows activity under defined assay conditions. Concentration, medium composition, serum proteins, organism strain and assay design can materially change antimicrobial-peptide results.

Evidence typeExpression work and in-vitro microbial assays
Bacteria testedP. aeruginosa, S. aureus and S. epidermidis
Reported EC50 range1.3–3.6 µg/mL
Clinical treatmentNone; no patient administration

Results in context

The authors also tested HSV-1 and adenovirus in direct inactivation experiments and reported significant titer reductions. That is laboratory evidence, not proof of therapeutic efficacy or safe dosing in the eye.

Because LL-37 also interacts with mammalian cells and immune pathways, antimicrobial activity alone is not a complete benefit-risk assessment.

What this study cannot answer

In-vitro potency does not establish exposure, tolerability or efficacy in humans.

Endogenous peptide expression does not prove that an exogenous preparation is safe.

Sources & editorial method

The editorial workflow starts with linked peer-reviewed papers, trial registries or regulatory records; extracts the population or model, endpoints, numerical results and limitations; and separates the studied intervention from catalog material. AI-assisted drafting was used to structure the first version. Claims, figures, evidence labels and limitations were checked against the linked records in the site editorial workflow. This is not independent peer review.

3 linked records are listed in the references below. Read the editorial and AI-assistance policy.

How to interpret this article

Source-checked on 2026-08-28. Null findings and study limitations are retained. This is not independent peer review, medical advice, a customer case, or validation of a catalog lot.

Research-use boundary: Catalog materials discussed on this website are for laboratory research, development and manufacturing use only, not for human or veterinary use. This content is not medical advice and does not provide administration instructions.

Primary records and authoritative sources

  1. LL-37 ocular-surface expression and antimicrobial activityGordon YJ, et al. Current Eye Research. 2005. PMID 16020269.
  2. LL-37 analog activity, cytotoxicity and serum inhibitionIn-vitro context; PMID 15980359.
  3. Certain Bulk Drug Substances That May Present Significant Safety RisksU.S. FDA. Current compounding safety-information page.
Research pathways

Continue with structured records

Move from this editorial analysis to the product identity, filtered evidence and controlled terminology behind it.

Editorial source check: NHD evidence editorial workflow · 2026-08-28